Ultimate Windows Utility
As the name says, it truly does justice to its name with innumerable config options that MS disabled and also adding safety/privacy tools. Must to check out if you have bene using windows for some time.
One place to get your apps, apply tweaks or enable features etc,
https://christitus.com/windows-tool/#one-command---download-and-usage
Windows Privacy tuning tool - Free
Helps debloat a bit as well as undo the infamous privacy trackers that Microsoft enables.
Use at your own risk/judgement. Worked fine for my Win 11. Open source project.
https://github.com/undergroundwires/privacy.sexy
With Covid pandemic, Online meetings are now a necessity. Zoom, Google meet, Bluejeans and old world tools Skype - almost all tools can be called as essential utilities... :)
One day - during a call (Windows 10 Pro) - suddenly the camera got disabled. When I tried to enable from the client (Zoom, Meet etc), the camera will not turn on. Similarly sometimes microphone would get disabled and would not turn on.
Steps should be same for both Windows 10 Home & Pro. Though I used them on Windows 10 Pro.
Short term fix - Go to Privacy Setting-> Camera-> Check "Camera Access for this device" is on. If not enable it. Step 2 : Enable allow apps to use camera.
Repeat the same steps for Microphone.
But,.. but.. this repeats every 10 mins. Camera or Mic will get disabled every 10 mins and I had to repeat above steps to get them enabled... yikes!
Fix that worked -
Luckily internet with Google search helps!
First things first - Check event log. Type Event viewer, open the app. Let it load - might take few mins (upto 15 mins maybe?)
Once loaded, on the main screen you will see Error & Warning. For me, I had quite a few warning in last 1 hours and all of them were related to Event 10016. Yes - it was the notorious DCOM permission issue and very likely with Runbroker services. Double click on 10016 and it will show the details of all occurrences with messages.
Sample Error Message:
The application-specific permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID
{2593F8B9-4EAF-457C-B68A-50F6B8EA6B54}
and APPID
{15C20B67-12E7-4BB6-92BB-7AFF07997402}
to the user PERSONAL\sampleuser SID (S-1-5-21-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxx) from address LocalHost (Using LRPC) running in the application container Unavailable SID (Unavailable). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.
[xxx is numbers]
How to fix -
Quite a few helpful articles exist to fix the DCOM runbroker permission issue. Do note, these will require using advanced tools . The fix did work for me!
Step 1. Try this simple step. If it works- you are in luck!
Removed Delayed autostart for a critical windows service. Follow the link below for detailed steps
https://www.winhelponline.com/blog/fix-event-id-10016-distributedcom-error-event-log-dcomcnfg-permissions/
Step 2: This is more involved. Follow any of these links for steps to resolve the issue
Slight differences in details, but mostly same.
Hope it helps you with issues like occasional windows freeze or Camera and mic muting themselves, getting disabled, permission issues.
In my case, very likely the issue got triggered after a) changing my login from local to Microsoft account or 2) Upgrading my Windows.
With the advent of digicams, photography for amateurs(like me) is about click, preview and keep/delete. But at times there is need to share those high resolution pics via email. And with most of us using ADSL, which means slower upload speed as compared to download speed, sending across pics can be bit painful. Thankfully there are loads of batch resize tool available to help us cut down the size of image while maintaing most of the image quality. One of the tools which I personally use and find quite adequate is Visualizer Photo resize (http://www.freeimagebrowser.com/resize/). Just point to the folder which contains all the pics, the desired size of the new pics and yes you are done. All your photos are resized in one click . It simple. But then it means not too much of configurations…for me it works fine. And yes its FREE.
On another note, for those in India , if you ever suspected u were missing belonging from your airline baggage, this might be just what you have been thinking. Certainly for me, its just the tip of iceberg. The fact that complaints almost fall to deaf ears, probably calls for deeper investigation. Anyway herez the most recent news about the issue…. Finally at least somewhere culprit is caught…..[ http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/subcontinent/2007/June/subcontinent_June433.xml§ion=subcontinent&col=
]
I wonder if they cant use security tapes available to investigate the claims of its customers instead of shooing them away……long live customer care.
Yes, I am talking about the software based firewall which most of us use .... free or paid...
And most often than not, the decision of a particular firewall is based on its price and recommendation by our "friends", but then have we seen any comprehensive tests of these... something which would test each firewall for vulnerability...?
I came across one such study in the always useful Scott's Newsletter. You can get a copy of the same at http://www.scotsnewsletter.com/91.htm . Yes, its free . Its amazing how someone can write such a useful stuff, which obviously takes up loads of effort and maintain good quality and yet keep it free.
Coming to the discussion, Scott Newsletter pointed me to quite a comprehensive lists of tests done for personal firewalls. yes, it includes the seemingly popular firewalls , Zone Alarm( free and Pro versions tested separately), McAfee, Norton Internet Security, Sygate and lots of others and it ranks them. You will be surprised by the results of the effectiveness of your firewall and perhaps your "sense" of security might change once you go through the results.
Here is the link to the full report,
http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-personal-firewall-analysis/leak-tests-results.php#firewalls-ratings
Or take a look at the firewall effectiveness at this website:
http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests_overview.php
(Click View results to see the results comparing different firewall products).
Well, though it has been stressed in tests, but its a point worth noting that the firewall tests were carried out after "disabling" the antivirus. The raw strength of firewall defence was used to asses them. But in a real world, there is generally an antivirus running on user's pc, hopefully with latest definitions and engines. These antivirus can block some of the attacks , but then quite few and not really a great alternative to firewall's own strength to catch them up.
Hope this helps in choosing the firewall, more on rationale.
Life makes you wiser. It has been probably in one of my wiser moments that I had been trying to get some insurance policies in India and was trying to search(aka google) for the different policies on the web. And then it struck me, how badly these customer attracting sites are designed. Either for most of these players , the website dont exist or if they exist, the way they are designed serve little purpose. For example take the website of Bajaj Allianz. It is one of the leading player in the insurance market. Take a look at its website (www.bajajallianz.com).
Being inquistive about their products, I would really want to know what they have to offer along with the price . If that interests me, well it would be really nice, if i Can get their contact info or can leave my name and number to be called up.
But then some things are different. You need to mandatory include your first name, last name, email address and mobile number before u can view any information. Even the products or their rates. Yes, they are so concerned about ur visit , that they wont let u view their products until u get them ur full details. Too bad they didnt ask for my salary, permamenet addresss and credit card info too....and yeah searching for information.....get ready for the mess ahead.....oops dont expect a site search.... people dont seem to beleive in it.
I fail to understand how can such a big company, with such good credentials in the market can afford with such a website design. Certainly a case of overzealous and overconfident designers/planners. But then this is defn not an isolated case.. but irritating enuff for a corporate website....at least for me.
As for me, I am still looking. Provided some dummy information on their website
And then there is rediff . Excellent website with loads of info and features focused on Indian community. I suspect , they copy yahoo in terms of their features and business models. But then at least on email... i would give them a big zero. Even with a "unlimited storage" account, i can hardly use it. Rather I am unable to use it. Perhaps this email service provider forgot the bulk mail option. To be true, there is a BULK mail folder, but then all the spam gets into inbox. No message into bulk mail.
Why am i writing all this.... well because i felt this is my private space and i could write about something, which I am unable to comprehend. Perhaps it makes some business sense to them. But to me, it doesnt.
And yeah.. a small disclaimer... These are not the only sites which seem bad to me, but these do trouble me. These are only my personal opinions. Your comments are welcome.
